|
|
|
|
Compare Amazfit Pace vs Apple Watch Series 3 vs Fossil Q Neely |
|||
| Smartwatch | Smartwatch | Hybrid Watch | |
| Release / Update | 2017 | 2017 | 2017 |
| Suggested Price | $130 | $279 | $155 |
 |
|
|
|
Activity & Fitness |
|||
| Calories | |||
| Cycling (Bicycling) | |||
| Distance | |||
| Heart | |||
| VO2max (Oxygen) | |||
| Sleep | |||
| Steps | |||
| Swim | |||
Battery |
|||
| Duration | 5 days | 18 hours | 5 months |
| Charging | Rechargeable | Wireless charging | Not rechargeable |
|
|
|||
Compatibility |
|||
| Android | |||
| iOS | |||
| Windows Phone | |||
| Mac | |||
| Windows | |||
Connectivity |
|||
| Bluetooth | |||
| Cellular | |||
| GPS | |||
| NFC | |||
| Wi-Fi | |||
Display |
|||
| Color | |||
| Resolution | 320x300 | 38mm: 340x272 42mm: 390x312 |
|
| Size | 1.34" | 1.5" 1.65" |
|
| Touch | |||
| Type | TFT LCD | AMOLED | |
Functions |
|||
| Audio Speaker | |||
| Clock | |||
| Phone | |||
| Vibration | |||
| Voice | |||
| Camera | |||
Hardware |
|||
| Accelerometer | |||
| Barometer or Altimeter | |||
| Ultraviolet Sensor | |||
| Water Resistance | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) | 5ATM (50 metres) | 5ATM (50 metres) |
Notifications |
|||
| Phone | |||
| Emails | |||
| Texts | |||
Software |
|||
| Operating System | Propietary | watchOS 4.0, upgradable to 5.2.1 | |
| Apps | |||
| Music | |||
More Info & Buy |
|||
| Storage | 16GB, 768 MB RAM |
||
| Extra | Colors: Space Black, Silver Build: Stainless Steel/Ceramic back 3D Touch display Bluetooth 4.2 |
||
| Pros | Amazfit Pace Pros |
Apple Watch Series 3 Pros + Adds barometer to GPS and swimproofing |
Fossil Q Neely Pros |
| Cons | Amazfit Pace Cons |
Apple Watch Series 3 Cons - Battery life takes a major hit when making calls or during GPS workouts |
Fossil Q Neely Cons |
|
|
|
|