Compare Smartwatches and Fitness trackers.
Compare Smartwatches
Amazfit Pace vs Garmin Vivosport vs Fossil Q Machine
Amazfit
Pace
Remove
Garmin
Vivosport
Remove
Fossil
Q Machine
Remove
Compare Amazfit Pace vs Garmin Vivosport vs Fossil Q Machine
Smartwatch
Fitness Tracker
Hybrid Watch
Release / Update
2017
2017
2018
Suggested Price
$130
$199
$175
Activity & Fitness
Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heart
VO2max (Oxygen)
Sleep
Steps
Swim
Battery
Duration
5 days
7 days
1 year
Charging
Rechargeable
Rechargeable
Not rechargeable
Compatibility
Android
iOS
Windows Phone
Mac
Windows
Connectivity
Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi
Display
Color
Resolution
320x300
72x144
n
Size
1.34"
Touch
Type
TFT LCD
MIP
Functions
Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice
Camera
Hardware
Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance
IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins)
5ATM (50 metres)
5ATM (50 metres)
Notifications
Phone
Emails
Texts
Software
Operating System
Propietary
Apps
Music
More Info & Buy
Storage
Extra
Pros
Amazfit Pace Pros
Garmin Vivosport Pros
+ Comfortable design
+ Accurate GPS and HRM
+ VO2 Max estimations
+ Good battery life
Fossil Q Machine Pros
Cons
Amazfit Pace Cons
Garmin Vivosport Cons
- Rep counting is still tacked on
- Washed out display
- Slightly buggy automatic exercise tracking
Fossil Q Machine Cons
Create a New Comparison
Remove an item to add another one
or
Create a New Comparison