Compare Smartwatches and Fitness trackers.
  Apple Watch Series 3 Garmin Vivosport Fossil Q Neely

Compare Apple Watch Series 3 vs Garmin Vivosport vs Fossil Q Neely

  Smartwatch Fitness Tracker Hybrid Watch
Release / Update 2017 2017 2017
Suggested Price $279 $199 $155
 

Activity & Fitness

Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heart
VO2max (Oxygen)
Sleep
Steps
Swim

Battery

Duration 18 hours 7 days 5 months
Charging Wireless charging Rechargeable Not rechargeable

Compatibility

Android
iOS
Windows Phone
Mac
Windows

Connectivity

Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi

Display

Color
Resolution 38mm: 340x272
42mm: 390x312
72x144
Size 1.5"
1.65"
Touch
Type AMOLED MIP

Functions

Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice
Camera

Hardware

Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance 5ATM (50 metres) 5ATM (50 metres) 5ATM (50 metres)

Notifications

Phone
Emails
Texts

Software

Operating System watchOS 4.0, upgradable to 5.2.1
Apps
Music

More Info & Buy

Storage
16GB, 768 MB RAM
Extra
Colors: Space Black, Silver
Build: Stainless Steel/Ceramic back
3D Touch display
Bluetooth 4.2
Pros
Apple Watch Series 3 Pros
+ Adds barometer to GPS and swimproofing
Garmin Vivosport Pros
+ Comfortable design
+ Accurate GPS and HRM
+ VO2 Max estimations
+ Good battery life
Fossil Q Neely Pros
Cons
Apple Watch Series 3 Cons
- Battery life takes a major hit when making calls or during GPS workouts
Garmin Vivosport Cons
- Rep counting is still tacked on
- Washed out display
- Slightly buggy automatic exercise tracking
Fossil Q Neely Cons
 
Create a New Comparison
© 2024 COMPAREW.com — Compare Smartwatches, pros and cons from USA customers.