Compare Smartwatches and Fitness trackers.
  ASUS ZenWatch 2 Garmin Vivosport Fossil Q Neely

Compare ASUS ZenWatch 2 vs Garmin Vivosport vs Fossil Q Neely

  Smartwatch Fitness Tracker Hybrid Watch
Release / Update 2015 2017 2017
Suggested Price $150 $199 $155
 

Activity & Fitness

Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heart
VO2max (Oxygen)
Sleep
Steps
Swim

Battery

Duration 7 days 5 months
Charging Rechargeable Rechargeable Not rechargeable

Compatibility

Android
iOS
Windows Phone
Mac
Windows

Connectivity

Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi

Display

Color
Resolution 320x320 72x144
Size 1.63"
1.45"
Touch
Type AMOLED MIP

Functions

Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice
Camera

Hardware

Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) 5ATM (50 metres) 5ATM (50 metres)

Notifications

Phone
Emails
Texts

Software

Operating System Android Wear 2
Apps
Music

More Info & Buy

Storage
Extra
Pros
ASUS ZenWatch 2 Pros
Garmin Vivosport Pros
+ Comfortable design
+ Accurate GPS and HRM
+ VO2 Max estimations
+ Good battery life
Fossil Q Neely Pros
Cons
ASUS ZenWatch 2 Cons
Garmin Vivosport Cons
- Rep counting is still tacked on
- Washed out display
- Slightly buggy automatic exercise tracking
Fossil Q Neely Cons
 
Create a New Comparison
© 2019 COMPAREW.com — Compare Smartwatches, pros and cons from USA customers.