Compare Smartwatches and Fitness trackers.
  Fitbit Ionic Garmin Vivoactive HR Samsung Galaxy Watch Active

Compare Fitbit Ionic vs Garmin Vivoactive HR vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Active

  Smartwatch Smartwatch Smartwatch
Release / Update 2017 2016 2019
Suggested Price $299 $250 $199
 

Activity & Fitness

Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heart
VO2max (Oxygen)
Sleep
Steps
Swim

Battery

Duration 3 days 13 hours to 8 days 2 days
Charging Rechargeable Rechargeable Qi wireless charging

Compatibility

Android
iOS
Windows Phone
Mac
Windows

Connectivity

Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi

Display

Color
Resolution 348x250 148x205 360x360
Size 1.42" 1.38" 1.1"
Touch
Type OLED Super AMOLED

Functions

Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice
Camera

Hardware

Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance 5ATM (50 metres) 5ATM (50 metres) 5ATM (50 metres)

Notifications

Phone
Emails
Texts

Software

Operating System Fitbit OS Tizen 4.0
Apps
Music

More Info & Buy

Storage
2.5GB
4GB, 768 MB RAM
Extra
Colors: Silver, Black, Rose Gold, Sea Green
Samsung Pay
Bluetooth 4.2
Pros
Fitbit Ionic Pros
+ Bright display
+ Variety of fitness options
Garmin Vivoactive HR Pros
Samsung Galaxy Watch Active Pros
+ High-end design
+ Competitive price
+ Reliable battery life
+ Always-on display
+ Good fitness-tracking features
Cons
Fitbit Ionic Cons
- Slow interface
- Severe lack of apps
Garmin Vivoactive HR Cons
Samsung Galaxy Watch Active Cons
- Lacks rotating bezel
- No cellular connectivity
- Bixby is a poor voice assistant
- Clumsy to use with non-Samsung phones
- Fewer third-party apps than other smartwatches
 
Create a New Comparison
© 2020 COMPAREW.com — Compare Smartwatches, pros and cons from USA customers.