|
|
|
|
Compare Fossil Q Neely vs Fossil Explorist vs Samsung Galaxy Watch Active |
|||
| Hybrid Watch | Smartwatch | Smartwatch | |
| Release / Update | 2017 | 2018 | 2019 |
| Suggested Price | $155 | $255 | $199 |
 |
|
|
|
Activity & Fitness |
|||
| Calories | |||
| Cycling (Bicycling) | |||
| Distance | |||
| Heart | |||
| VO2max (Oxygen) | |||
| Sleep | |||
| Steps | |||
| Swim | |||
Battery |
|||
| Duration | 5 months | 24 hours | 2 days |
| Charging | Not rechargeable | Rechargeable | Qi wireless charging |
|
|
|||
Compatibility |
|||
| Android | |||
| iOS | |||
| Windows Phone | |||
| Mac | |||
| Windows | |||
Connectivity |
|||
| Bluetooth | |||
| Cellular | |||
| GPS | |||
| NFC | |||
| Wi-Fi | |||
Display |
|||
| Color | |||
| Resolution | 454x454 | 360x360 | |
| Size | 1.4" | 1.1" | |
| Touch | |||
| Type | AMOLED | Super AMOLED | |
Functions |
|||
| Audio Speaker | |||
| Clock | |||
| Phone | |||
| Vibration | |||
| Voice | |||
| Camera | |||
Hardware |
|||
| Accelerometer | |||
| Barometer or Altimeter | |||
| Ultraviolet Sensor | |||
| Water Resistance | 5ATM (50 metres) | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 mins) | 5ATM (50 metres) |
Notifications |
|||
| Phone | |||
| Emails | |||
| Texts | |||
Software |
|||
| Operating System | Wear OS | Tizen 4.0 | |
| Apps | |||
| Music | |||
More Info & Buy |
|||
| Storage | 4GB, 768 MB RAM |
||
| Extra | Colors: Silver, Black, Rose Gold, Sea Green Samsung Pay Bluetooth 4.2 |
||
| Pros | Fossil Q Neely Pros |
Fossil Explorist Pros |
Samsung Galaxy Watch Active Pros + High-end design + Competitive price + Reliable battery life + Always-on display + Good fitness-tracking features |
| Cons | Fossil Q Neely Cons |
Fossil Explorist Cons |
Samsung Galaxy Watch Active Cons - Lacks rotating bezel - No cellular connectivity - Bixby is a poor voice assistant - Clumsy to use with non-Samsung phones - Fewer third-party apps than other smartwatches |
|
|
|
|