Compare Smartwatches and Fitness trackers.
  Fossil Q Machine Samsung Galaxy Watch Fossil Sport

Compare Fossil Q Machine vs Samsung Galaxy Watch vs Fossil Sport

  Hybrid Watch Smartwatch Smartwatch
Release / Update 2018 2018 2018
Suggested Price $175 $329 $275
 

Activity & Fitness

Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heart
VO2max (Oxygen)
Sleep
Steps
Swim

Battery

Duration 1 year 7 days 2 days
Charging Not rechargeable Qi wireless charging Rechargeable

Compatibility

Android
iOS
Windows Phone
Mac
Windows

Connectivity

Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi

Display

Color
Resolution n 360x360 390x390
Size 1.2"
1.3"
1.2"
Touch
Type Super AMOLED AMOLED

Functions

Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice
Camera

Hardware

Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance 5ATM (50 metres) 5ATM (50 metres) IP68

Notifications

Phone
Emails
Texts

Software

Operating System Tizen 4.0
Apps
Music

More Info & Buy

Storage
4 GB, 1.5 GB RAM (LTE model)
4 GB, 768 MB RAM (BTT model)
4GB
Extra
Colors: Silver (46mm); Midnight Black, Rose Gold (42mm)
Build: Stainless Steel 316L
Samsung Pay
Compatible with standard 20/22mm straps
Always-on display
Rotating bezel
Bluetooth 4.2
Pros
Fossil Q Machine Pros
Samsung Galaxy Watch Pros
+ Impressive battery life
+ Useful rotating bezel
Fossil Sport Pros
+ Lightweight design
+ Powerful watch
Cons
Fossil Q Machine Cons
Samsung Galaxy Watch Cons
- Annoying charger
- Bixby isn't great
Fossil Sport Cons
- Lacks high-end features
- GPS can be slow
 
Create a New Comparison
© 2024 COMPAREW.com — Compare Smartwatches, pros and cons from USA customers.