Compare Smartwatches and Fitness trackers.
  Garmin Vivosport Fossil Q Machine Garmin Vivoactive 3

Compare Garmin Vivosport vs Fossil Q Machine vs Garmin Vivoactive 3

  Fitness Tracker Hybrid Watch Smartwatch
Release / Update 2017 2018 2017
Suggested Price $199 $175 $299
 

Activity & Fitness

Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heart
VO2max (Oxygen)
Sleep
Steps
Swim

Battery

Duration 7 days 1 year 7 days
Charging Rechargeable Not rechargeable Rechargeable

Compatibility

Android
iOS
Windows Phone
Mac
Windows

Connectivity

Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi

Display

Color
Resolution 72x144 n 240x240
Size 1.2"
Touch
Type MIP MIP

Functions

Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice
Camera

Hardware

Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance 5ATM (50 metres) 5ATM (50 metres) 5ATM (50 metres)

Notifications

Phone
Emails
Texts

Software

Operating System n
Apps
Music

More Info & Buy

Storage
Extra
Pros
Garmin Vivosport Pros
+ Comfortable design
+ Accurate GPS and HRM
+ VO2 Max estimations
+ Good battery life
Fossil Q Machine Pros
Garmin Vivoactive 3 Pros
Cons
Garmin Vivosport Cons
- Rep counting is still tacked on
- Washed out display
- Slightly buggy automatic exercise tracking
Fossil Q Machine Cons
Garmin Vivoactive 3 Cons
 
Create a New Comparison
© 2024 COMPAREW.com — Compare Smartwatches, pros and cons from USA customers.