Compare Smartwatches and Fitness trackers.
Compare Smartwatches
Fossil Q Machine vs Garmin Vivoactive HR
Fossil
Q Machine
Remove
Garmin
Vivoactive HR
Remove
Compare Fossil Q Machine vs Garmin Vivoactive HR
Hybrid Watch
Smartwatch
Release / Update
2018
2016
Suggested Price
$175
$250
Activity & Fitness
Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heart
VO2max (Oxygen)
Sleep
Steps
Swim
Battery
Duration
1 year
13 hours to 8 days
Charging
Not rechargeable
Rechargeable
Compatibility
Android
iOS
Windows Phone
Mac
Windows
Connectivity
Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi
Display
Color
Resolution
n
148x205
Size
1.38"
Touch
Type
Functions
Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice
Camera
Hardware
Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance
5ATM (50 metres)
5ATM (50 metres)
Notifications
Phone
Emails
Texts
Software
Operating System
Apps
Music
More Info & Buy
Storage
Extra
Pros
Fossil Q Machine Pros
Garmin Vivoactive HR Pros
Cons
Fossil Q Machine Cons
Garmin Vivoactive HR Cons
Create a New Comparison
Similar Wearables
Garmin
Vivosport
Fitness Tracker
Fossil
Q Neely
Hybrid Watch
Garmin
Vivomove HR
Hybrid Watch
Top Smartwatches
Apple
Watch Series 3
Smartwatch
Fitbit
Ionic
Smartwatch
Fitbit
Versa
Smartwatch
Top Fitness Trackers
Top Hybrid Watches
More by the Same Brands
Garmin
Vivosport
Fitness Tracker
Fossil
Q Neely
Hybrid Watch
Garmin
Vivomove HR
Hybrid Watch
Create a New Comparison