|
|
|
|
Compare Garmin Vivosport vs Fossil Q Neely vs Garmin Vivoactive HR |
|||
| Fitness Tracker | Hybrid Watch | Smartwatch | |
| Release / Update | 2017 | 2017 | 2016 |
| Suggested Price | $199 | $155 | $250 |
 |
|
|
|
Activity & Fitness |
|||
| Calories | |||
| Cycling (Bicycling) | |||
| Distance | |||
| Heart | |||
| VO2max (Oxygen) | |||
| Sleep | |||
| Steps | |||
| Swim | |||
Battery |
|||
| Duration | 7 days | 5 months | 13 hours to 8 days |
| Charging | Rechargeable | Not rechargeable | Rechargeable |
|
|
|||
Compatibility |
|||
| Android | |||
| iOS | |||
| Windows Phone | |||
| Mac | |||
| Windows | |||
Connectivity |
|||
| Bluetooth | |||
| Cellular | |||
| GPS | |||
| NFC | |||
| Wi-Fi | |||
Display |
|||
| Color | |||
| Resolution | 72x144 | 148x205 | |
| Size | 1.38" | ||
| Touch | |||
| Type | MIP | ||
Functions |
|||
| Audio Speaker | |||
| Clock | |||
| Phone | |||
| Vibration | |||
| Voice | |||
| Camera | |||
Hardware |
|||
| Accelerometer | |||
| Barometer or Altimeter | |||
| Ultraviolet Sensor | |||
| Water Resistance | 5ATM (50 metres) | 5ATM (50 metres) | 5ATM (50 metres) |
Notifications |
|||
| Phone | |||
| Emails | |||
| Texts | |||
Software |
|||
| Operating System | |||
| Apps | |||
| Music | |||
More Info & Buy |
|||
| Storage | |||
| Extra | |||
| Pros | Garmin Vivosport Pros + Comfortable design + Accurate GPS and HRM + VO2 Max estimations + Good battery life |
Fossil Q Neely Pros |
Garmin Vivoactive HR Pros |
| Cons | Garmin Vivosport Cons - Rep counting is still tacked on - Washed out display - Slightly buggy automatic exercise tracking |
Fossil Q Neely Cons |
Garmin Vivoactive HR Cons |
|
|
|
|