|
|
|
|
Compare Fitbit Ionic vs Garmin Vivosport vs Fossil Q Neely |
|||
| Smartwatch | Fitness Tracker | Hybrid Watch | |
| Release / Update | 2017 | 2017 | 2017 |
| Suggested Price | $299 | $199 | $155 |
 |
|
|
|
Activity & Fitness |
|||
| Calories | |||
| Cycling (Bicycling) | |||
| Distance | |||
| Heart | |||
| VO2max (Oxygen) | |||
| Sleep | |||
| Steps | |||
| Swim | |||
Battery |
|||
| Duration | 3 days | 7 days | 5 months |
| Charging | Rechargeable | Rechargeable | Not rechargeable |
|
|
|||
Compatibility |
|||
| Android | |||
| iOS | |||
| Windows Phone | |||
| Mac | |||
| Windows | |||
Connectivity |
|||
| Bluetooth | |||
| Cellular | |||
| GPS | |||
| NFC | |||
| Wi-Fi | |||
Display |
|||
| Color | |||
| Resolution | 348x250 | 72x144 | |
| Size | 1.42" | ||
| Touch | |||
| Type | OLED | MIP | |
Functions |
|||
| Audio Speaker | |||
| Clock | |||
| Phone | |||
| Vibration | |||
| Voice | |||
| Camera | |||
Hardware |
|||
| Accelerometer | |||
| Barometer or Altimeter | |||
| Ultraviolet Sensor | |||
| Water Resistance | 5ATM (50 metres) | 5ATM (50 metres) | 5ATM (50 metres) |
Notifications |
|||
| Phone | |||
| Emails | |||
| Texts | |||
Software |
|||
| Operating System | Fitbit OS | ||
| Apps | |||
| Music | |||
More Info & Buy |
|||
| Storage | 2.5GB |
||
| Extra | |||
| Pros | Fitbit Ionic Pros + Bright display + Variety of fitness options |
Garmin Vivosport Pros + Comfortable design + Accurate GPS and HRM + VO2 Max estimations + Good battery life |
Fossil Q Neely Pros |
| Cons | Fitbit Ionic Cons - Slow interface - Severe lack of apps |
Garmin Vivosport Cons - Rep counting is still tacked on - Washed out display - Slightly buggy automatic exercise tracking |
Fossil Q Neely Cons |
|
|
|
|