Compare Smartwatches and Fitness trackers.
  Apple Watch Series 3 Fossil Q Neely Samsung Galaxy Watch

Compare Apple Watch Series 3 vs Fossil Q Neely vs Samsung Galaxy Watch

  Smartwatch Hybrid Watch Smartwatch
Release / Update 2017 2017 2018
Suggested Price $279 $155 $329
 

Activity & Fitness

Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heart
VO2max (Oxygen)
Sleep
Steps
Swim

Battery

Duration 18 hours 5 months 7 days
Charging Wireless charging Not rechargeable Qi wireless charging

Compatibility

Android
iOS
Windows Phone
Mac
Windows

Connectivity

Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi

Display

Color
Resolution 38mm: 340x272
42mm: 390x312
360x360
Size 1.5"
1.65"
1.2"
1.3"
Touch
Type AMOLED Super AMOLED

Functions

Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice
Camera

Hardware

Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance 5ATM (50 metres) 5ATM (50 metres) 5ATM (50 metres)

Notifications

Phone
Emails
Texts

Software

Operating System watchOS 4.0, upgradable to 5.2.1 Tizen 4.0
Apps
Music

More Info & Buy

Storage
16GB, 768 MB RAM
4 GB, 1.5 GB RAM (LTE model)
4 GB, 768 MB RAM (BTT model)
Extra
Colors: Space Black, Silver
Build: Stainless Steel/Ceramic back
3D Touch display
Bluetooth 4.2
Colors: Silver (46mm); Midnight Black, Rose Gold (42mm)
Build: Stainless Steel 316L
Samsung Pay
Compatible with standard 20/22mm straps
Always-on display
Rotating bezel
Bluetooth 4.2
Pros
Apple Watch Series 3 Pros
+ Adds barometer to GPS and swimproofing
Fossil Q Neely Pros
Samsung Galaxy Watch Pros
+ Impressive battery life
+ Useful rotating bezel
Cons
Apple Watch Series 3 Cons
- Battery life takes a major hit when making calls or during GPS workouts
Fossil Q Neely Cons
Samsung Galaxy Watch Cons
- Annoying charger
- Bixby isn't great
 
Create a New Comparison
© 2024 COMPAREW.com — Compare Smartwatches, pros and cons from USA customers.