Compare Smartwatches and Fitness trackers.
  Fossil Q Machine Fossil Q Neely Samsung Galaxy Watch

Compare Fossil Q Machine vs Fossil Q Neely vs Samsung Galaxy Watch

  Hybrid Watch Hybrid Watch Smartwatch
Release / Update 2018 2017 2018
Suggested Price $175 $155 $329
 

Activity & Fitness

Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heart
VO2max (Oxygen)
Sleep
Steps
Swim

Battery

Duration 1 year 5 months 7 days
Charging Not rechargeable Not rechargeable Qi wireless charging

Compatibility

Android
iOS
Windows Phone
Mac
Windows

Connectivity

Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi

Display

Color
Resolution n 360x360
Size 1.2"
1.3"
Touch
Type Super AMOLED

Functions

Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice
Camera

Hardware

Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance 5ATM (50 metres) 5ATM (50 metres) 5ATM (50 metres)

Notifications

Phone
Emails
Texts

Software

Operating System Tizen 4.0
Apps
Music

More Info & Buy

Storage
4 GB, 1.5 GB RAM (LTE model)
4 GB, 768 MB RAM (BTT model)
Extra
Colors: Silver (46mm); Midnight Black, Rose Gold (42mm)
Build: Stainless Steel 316L
Samsung Pay
Compatible with standard 20/22mm straps
Always-on display
Rotating bezel
Bluetooth 4.2
Pros
Fossil Q Machine Pros
Fossil Q Neely Pros
Samsung Galaxy Watch Pros
+ Impressive battery life
+ Useful rotating bezel
Cons
Fossil Q Machine Cons
Fossil Q Neely Cons
Samsung Galaxy Watch Cons
- Annoying charger
- Bixby isn't great
 
Create a New Comparison
© 2024 COMPAREW.com — Compare Smartwatches, pros and cons from USA customers.