|
|
|
|
Compare Fitbit Ionic vs Samsung Galaxy Watch vs Fossil Sport |
|||
| Smartwatch | Smartwatch | Smartwatch | |
| Release / Update | 2017 | 2018 | 2018 |
| Suggested Price | $299 | $329 | $275 |
 |
|
|
|
Activity & Fitness |
|||
| Calories | |||
| Cycling (Bicycling) | |||
| Distance | |||
| Heart | |||
| VO2max (Oxygen) | |||
| Sleep | |||
| Steps | |||
| Swim | |||
Battery |
|||
| Duration | 3 days | 7 days | 2 days |
| Charging | Rechargeable | Qi wireless charging | Rechargeable |
|
|
|||
Compatibility |
|||
| Android | |||
| iOS | |||
| Windows Phone | |||
| Mac | |||
| Windows | |||
Connectivity |
|||
| Bluetooth | |||
| Cellular | |||
| GPS | |||
| NFC | |||
| Wi-Fi | |||
Display |
|||
| Color | |||
| Resolution | 348x250 | 360x360 | 390x390 |
| Size | 1.42" | 1.2" 1.3" |
1.2" |
| Touch | |||
| Type | OLED | Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
Functions |
|||
| Audio Speaker | |||
| Clock | |||
| Phone | |||
| Vibration | |||
| Voice | |||
| Camera | |||
Hardware |
|||
| Accelerometer | |||
| Barometer or Altimeter | |||
| Ultraviolet Sensor | |||
| Water Resistance | 5ATM (50 metres) | 5ATM (50 metres) | IP68 |
Notifications |
|||
| Phone | |||
| Emails | |||
| Texts | |||
Software |
|||
| Operating System | Fitbit OS | Tizen 4.0 | |
| Apps | |||
| Music | |||
More Info & Buy |
|||
| Storage | 2.5GB |
4 GB, 1.5 GB RAM (LTE model) 4 GB, 768 MB RAM (BTT model) |
4GB |
| Extra | Colors: Silver (46mm); Midnight Black, Rose Gold (42mm) Build: Stainless Steel 316L Samsung Pay Compatible with standard 20/22mm straps Always-on display Rotating bezel Bluetooth 4.2 |
||
| Pros | Fitbit Ionic Pros + Bright display + Variety of fitness options |
Samsung Galaxy Watch Pros + Impressive battery life + Useful rotating bezel |
Fossil Sport Pros + Lightweight design + Powerful watch |
| Cons | Fitbit Ionic Cons - Slow interface - Severe lack of apps |
Samsung Galaxy Watch Cons - Annoying charger - Bixby isn't great |
Fossil Sport Cons - Lacks high-end features - GPS can be slow |
|
|
|
|