Compare Fitbit Versa vs Garmin Vivoactive 3 vs Samsung Galaxy Watch
|
| |
Smartwatch |
Smartwatch |
Smartwatch |
| Release / Update |
2018 |
2017 |
2018 |
| Suggested Price |
$199 |
$299 |
$329 |
| |
 |
 |
 |
Activity & Fitness
|
| Calories |
|
|
|
| Cycling (Bicycling) |
|
|
|
| Distance |
|
|
|
| Heart |
|
|
|
| VO2max (Oxygen) |
|
|
|
| Sleep |
|
|
|
| Steps |
|
|
|
| Swim |
|
|
|
Battery
|
| Duration |
4 days |
7 days |
7 days |
| Charging |
Rechargeable |
Rechargeable |
Qi wireless charging |
|
|
Compatibility
|
| Android |
|
|
|
| iOS |
|
|
|
| Windows Phone |
|
|
|
| Mac |
|
|
|
| Windows |
|
|
|
Connectivity
|
| Bluetooth |
|
|
|
| Cellular |
|
|
|
| GPS |
|
|
|
| NFC |
|
|
|
| Wi-Fi |
|
|
|
Display
|
| Color |
|
|
|
| Resolution |
300x300 |
240x240 |
360x360 |
| Size |
1.34" |
1.2" |
1.2" 1.3" |
| Touch |
|
|
|
| Type |
OLED |
MIP |
Super AMOLED |
Functions
|
| Audio Speaker |
|
|
|
| Clock |
|
|
|
| Phone |
|
|
|
| Vibration |
|
|
|
| Voice |
|
|
|
| Camera |
| | |
Hardware
|
| Accelerometer |
|
|
|
| Barometer or Altimeter |
|
|
|
| Ultraviolet Sensor |
|
|
|
| Water Resistance |
5ATM (50 metres) |
5ATM (50 metres) |
5ATM (50 metres) |
Notifications
|
| Phone |
|
|
|
| Emails |
|
|
|
| Texts |
|
|
|
Software
|
| Operating System |
Fitbit OS |
n |
Tizen 4.0 |
| Apps |
|
|
|
| Music |
|
|
|
More Info & Buy
|
| Storage |
2.5GB |
|
4 GB, 1.5 GB RAM (LTE model)
4 GB, 768 MB RAM (BTT model) |
| Extra |
|
|
Colors: Silver (46mm); Midnight Black, Rose Gold (42mm) Build: Stainless Steel 316L Samsung Pay Compatible with standard 20/22mm straps Always-on display Rotating bezel Bluetooth 4.2 |
| Pros |
Fitbit Versa Pros + Lightweight design + Relatively low price |
Garmin Vivoactive 3 Pros
|
Samsung Galaxy Watch Pros + Impressive battery life + Useful rotating bezel |
| Cons |
Fitbit Versa Cons - No GPS - Feels a little cheap and childish |
Garmin Vivoactive 3 Cons
|
Samsung Galaxy Watch Cons - Annoying charger - Bixby isn't great |
| |
 |
 |
 |