Compare Smartwatches and Fitness trackers.
Compare Smartwatches
Garmin Vivosport vs Fossil Q Machine
Garmin
Vivosport
Remove
Fossil
Q Machine
Remove
Compare Garmin Vivosport vs Fossil Q Machine
Fitness Tracker
Hybrid Watch
Release / Update
2017
2018
Suggested Price
$199
$175
Activity & Fitness
Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heart
VO2max (Oxygen)
Sleep
Steps
Swim
Battery
Duration
7 days
1 year
Charging
Rechargeable
Not rechargeable
Compatibility
Android
iOS
Windows Phone
Mac
Windows
Connectivity
Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi
Display
Color
Resolution
72x144
n
Size
Touch
Type
MIP
Functions
Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice
Camera
Hardware
Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance
5ATM (50 metres)
5ATM (50 metres)
Notifications
Phone
Emails
Texts
Software
Operating System
Apps
Music
More Info & Buy
Storage
Extra
Pros
Garmin Vivosport Pros
+ Comfortable design
+ Accurate GPS and HRM
+ VO2 Max estimations
+ Good battery life
Fossil Q Machine Pros
Cons
Garmin Vivosport Cons
- Rep counting is still tacked on
- Washed out display
- Slightly buggy automatic exercise tracking
Fossil Q Machine Cons
Create a New Comparison
Similar Wearables
Fossil
Q Neely
Hybrid Watch
Garmin
Vivomove HR
Hybrid Watch
Fossil
Explorist
Smartwatch
Top Smartwatches
Apple
Watch Series 3
Smartwatch
Fitbit
Ionic
Smartwatch
Fitbit
Versa
Smartwatch
Top Fitness Trackers
Top Hybrid Watches
More by the Same Brands
Fossil
Q Neely
Hybrid Watch
Garmin
Vivomove HR
Hybrid Watch
Fossil
Explorist
Smartwatch
Create a New Comparison