Compare Smartwatches and Fitness trackers.
  Fossil Q Machine Fossil Q Neely Garmin Vivoactive HR

Compare Fossil Q Machine vs Fossil Q Neely vs Garmin Vivoactive HR

  Hybrid Watch Hybrid Watch Smartwatch
Release / Update 2018 2017 2016
Suggested Price $175 $155 $250
 

Activity & Fitness

Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heart
VO2max (Oxygen)
Sleep
Steps
Swim

Battery

Duration 1 year 5 months 13 hours to 8 days
Charging Not rechargeable Not rechargeable Rechargeable

Compatibility

Android
iOS
Windows Phone
Mac
Windows

Connectivity

Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi

Display

Color
Resolution n 148x205
Size 1.38"
Touch
Type

Functions

Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice
Camera

Hardware

Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance 5ATM (50 metres) 5ATM (50 metres) 5ATM (50 metres)

Notifications

Phone
Emails
Texts

Software

Operating System
Apps
Music

More Info & Buy

Storage
Extra
Pros
Fossil Q Machine Pros
Fossil Q Neely Pros
Garmin Vivoactive HR Pros
Cons
Fossil Q Machine Cons
Fossil Q Neely Cons
Garmin Vivoactive HR Cons
 
Create a New Comparison
© 2024 COMPAREW.com — Compare Smartwatches, pros and cons from USA customers.