Compare Smartwatches and Fitness trackers.
Compare Smartwatches
Garmin Vivoactive HR vs Fossil Sport
Garmin
Vivoactive HR
Remove
Fossil
Sport
Remove
Compare Garmin Vivoactive HR vs Fossil Sport
Smartwatch
Smartwatch
Release / Update
2016
2018
Suggested Price
$250
$275
Activity & Fitness
Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heart
VO2max (Oxygen)
Sleep
Steps
Swim
Battery
Duration
13 hours to 8 days
2 days
Charging
Rechargeable
Rechargeable
Compatibility
Android
iOS
Windows Phone
Mac
Windows
Connectivity
Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi
Display
Color
Resolution
148x205
390x390
Size
1.38"
1.2"
Touch
Type
AMOLED
Functions
Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice
Camera
Hardware
Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance
5ATM (50 metres)
IP68
Notifications
Phone
Emails
Texts
Software
Operating System
Apps
Music
More Info & Buy
Storage
4GB
Extra
Pros
Garmin Vivoactive HR Pros
Fossil Sport Pros
+ Lightweight design
+ Powerful watch
Cons
Garmin Vivoactive HR Cons
Fossil Sport Cons
- Lacks high-end features
- GPS can be slow
Create a New Comparison
Similar Wearables
Garmin
Vivosport
Fitness Tracker
Fossil
Q Machine
Hybrid Watch
Fossil
Q Neely
Hybrid Watch
Top Smartwatches
Apple
Watch Series 3
Smartwatch
Fitbit
Ionic
Smartwatch
Fitbit
Versa
Smartwatch
Top Fitness Trackers
Top Hybrid Watches
More by the Same Brands
Garmin
Vivosport
Fitness Tracker
Fossil
Q Machine
Hybrid Watch
Fossil
Q Neely
Hybrid Watch
Create a New Comparison