Compare Smartwatches and Fitness trackers.
  Fossil Q Neely Garmin Vivoactive HR Fossil Sport

Compare Fossil Q Neely vs Garmin Vivoactive HR vs Fossil Sport

  Hybrid Watch Smartwatch Smartwatch
Release / Update 2017 2016 2018
Suggested Price $155 $250 $275
 

Activity & Fitness

Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heart
VO2max (Oxygen)
Sleep
Steps
Swim

Battery

Duration 5 months 13 hours to 8 days 2 days
Charging Not rechargeable Rechargeable Rechargeable

Compatibility

Android
iOS
Windows Phone
Mac
Windows

Connectivity

Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi

Display

Color
Resolution 148x205 390x390
Size 1.38" 1.2"
Touch
Type AMOLED

Functions

Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice
Camera

Hardware

Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance 5ATM (50 metres) 5ATM (50 metres) IP68

Notifications

Phone
Emails
Texts

Software

Operating System
Apps
Music

More Info & Buy

Storage
4GB
Extra
Pros
Fossil Q Neely Pros
Garmin Vivoactive HR Pros
Fossil Sport Pros
+ Lightweight design
+ Powerful watch
Cons
Fossil Q Neely Cons
Garmin Vivoactive HR Cons
Fossil Sport Cons
- Lacks high-end features
- GPS can be slow
 
Create a New Comparison
© 2024 COMPAREW.com — Compare Smartwatches, pros and cons from USA customers.