Compare Smartwatches and Fitness trackers.
Compare Smartwatches
Garmin Vivosport vs Fossil Sport
Garmin
Vivosport
Remove
Fossil
Sport
Remove
Compare Garmin Vivosport vs Fossil Sport
Fitness Tracker
Smartwatch
Release / Update
2017
2018
Suggested Price
$199
$275
Activity & Fitness
Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heart
VO2max (Oxygen)
Sleep
Steps
Swim
Battery
Duration
7 days
2 days
Charging
Rechargeable
Rechargeable
Compatibility
Android
iOS
Windows Phone
Mac
Windows
Connectivity
Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi
Display
Color
Resolution
72x144
390x390
Size
1.2"
Touch
Type
MIP
AMOLED
Functions
Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice
Camera
Hardware
Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance
5ATM (50 metres)
IP68
Notifications
Phone
Emails
Texts
Software
Operating System
Apps
Music
More Info & Buy
Storage
4GB
Extra
Pros
Garmin Vivosport Pros
+ Comfortable design
+ Accurate GPS and HRM
+ VO2 Max estimations
+ Good battery life
Fossil Sport Pros
+ Lightweight design
+ Powerful watch
Cons
Garmin Vivosport Cons
- Rep counting is still tacked on
- Washed out display
- Slightly buggy automatic exercise tracking
Fossil Sport Cons
- Lacks high-end features
- GPS can be slow
Create a New Comparison
Similar Wearables
Fossil
Q Machine
Hybrid Watch
Fossil
Q Neely
Hybrid Watch
Garmin
Vivomove HR
Hybrid Watch
Top Smartwatches
Apple
Watch Series 3
Smartwatch
Fitbit
Ionic
Smartwatch
Fitbit
Versa
Smartwatch
Top Fitness Trackers
Top Hybrid Watches
More by the Same Brands
Fossil
Q Machine
Hybrid Watch
Fossil
Q Neely
Hybrid Watch
Garmin
Vivomove HR
Hybrid Watch
Create a New Comparison