Compare Smartwatches and Fitness trackers.
  Fitbit Ionic Garmin Vivosport Fossil Sport

Compare Fitbit Ionic vs Garmin Vivosport vs Fossil Sport

  Smartwatch Fitness Tracker Smartwatch
Release / Update 2017 2017 2018
Suggested Price $299 $199 $275
 

Activity & Fitness

Calories
Cycling (Bicycling)
Distance
Heart
VO2max (Oxygen)
Sleep
Steps
Swim

Battery

Duration 3 days 7 days 2 days
Charging Rechargeable Rechargeable Rechargeable

Compatibility

Android
iOS
Windows Phone
Mac
Windows

Connectivity

Bluetooth
Cellular
GPS
NFC
Wi-Fi

Display

Color
Resolution 348x250 72x144 390x390
Size 1.42" 1.2"
Touch
Type OLED MIP AMOLED

Functions

Audio Speaker
Clock
Phone
Vibration
Voice
Camera

Hardware

Accelerometer
Barometer or Altimeter
Ultraviolet Sensor
Water Resistance 5ATM (50 metres) 5ATM (50 metres) IP68

Notifications

Phone
Emails
Texts

Software

Operating System Fitbit OS
Apps
Music

More Info & Buy

Storage
2.5GB
4GB
Extra
Pros
Fitbit Ionic Pros
+ Bright display
+ Variety of fitness options
Garmin Vivosport Pros
+ Comfortable design
+ Accurate GPS and HRM
+ VO2 Max estimations
+ Good battery life
Fossil Sport Pros
+ Lightweight design
+ Powerful watch
Cons
Fitbit Ionic Cons
- Slow interface
- Severe lack of apps
Garmin Vivosport Cons
- Rep counting is still tacked on
- Washed out display
- Slightly buggy automatic exercise tracking
Fossil Sport Cons
- Lacks high-end features
- GPS can be slow
 
Create a New Comparison
© 2024 COMPAREW.com — Compare Smartwatches, pros and cons from USA customers.